Gastroenterol Res
Gastroenterology Research, ISSN 1918-2805 print, 1918-2813 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Gastroenterol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.gastrores.org

Case Report

Volume 3, Number 5, October 2010, pages 223-228


Glypican-3-Expressing Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Non-Cirrhotic Patient with Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: Case Report and Literature Review

Mona H. Ismaila, b, c

aCollege of Medicine, University of Dammam, Consultant Hepatologist and Gastroenterologist, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, King Fahad Hospital of the University, Saudi Arabia
bDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology & Multiorgan Transplant Programme, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
cCorresponding address: Assistant Professor of Medicine at College of Medicine, University of Dammam and Consultant Hepatologist and Gastroenterologist at Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology at King Fahad Hospital of the University. PO box 40149. Al-Khobar 31952, Saudi Arabia

Manuscript accepted for publication September 2, 2010
Short title: GPC-3-Expressing HCC
doi: https://doi.org/10.4021/gr224w

Abstract▴Top 

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is now considered as the major cause of cryptogenic cirrhosis, which can progress to HCC. Glypican-3 is a member of the Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycan (HSP) family that plays a role in cell growth, differentiation, and migration. Glypican-3 is significantly up-regulated in a majority of HCCs compared to normal and benign liver samples. Glypican-3 protein is detectable in around 40-53% of HCC patients whereas it is not detectable in the serum of healthy individuals. There are several reports of HCC arising in the setting of non-cirrhotic NASH. This report describes a case of HCC that expressed Glypican-3 and arose in a 47-year-old female with noncirrhotic NASH.

Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma; Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; Glypican-3; Noncirrhotic

Introduction▴Top 

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common and deadly malignancy and its incidence is increasing [1]. Most cases of HCC develop in the presence of advanced chronic liver disease, related mainly to the hepatitis B and C viruses and alcohol abuse, in which ongoing liver injury and regeneration predispose patients to neoplasia over time [2]. The major etiologies and risk factors for HCC development are well-defined, and some of the multiple steps involved in hepatocarcinogenesis have been elucidated in recent years [3]. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is now considered as the major cause of cryptogenic cirrhosis in many regions of the world. Progression of NASH to cirrhosis and hepatocellular damage is typically slow, and most cases of HCC arise in patients with preexisting cirrhosis. The majority of patients with “cryptogenic” cirrhosis complicated by HCC have risk factors for NASH [4]. Unfortunately, the lack of steatosis and necroinflammation once cirrhosis occurs provides little evidence for the etiology of HCC [5]. Advances in the diagnosis and management of HCC have significant impact in patients who are at risk of developing HCC. Serological markers for HCC are important for early diagnosis and for monitoring tumor aggressiveness, treatment responsiveness, recurrence and survival [6]. Surveillance of patients at risk of developing HCC is based on ultrasound (US) examinations and serum alpha fetoprotein (AFP) performed at either 6 or 12 months interval. Early detection of HCC in patients with cirrhosis is a challenging issue with certain limitations. For example, certain subtypes of HCC are not associated with an elevated serum AFP level [7]. Imaging studies such as US and computerized tomography (CT) standard imaging techniques play some role in the identification and localisation of HCC. However, the diagnostic sensitivity of these imaging modalities decreases in small lesions, especially in those with size less than 2 cm. Thus, the gold standard for diagnosing HCC is pathological examination of the liver tissue [8].

Lately, a novel marker, glypican-3 (GPC3), has been proposed as a diagnostic marker for HCC [9]. GPC3 expression was shown to be markedly elevated in a large proportion of HCCs, whereas preneo­plastic and nonneoplastic liver tissue samples revealed less frequent and no GPC3 expression [10, 11].

There are several reports of HCC arising in the setting of non-cirrhotic NASH [12-14]. This report describes a case of HCC that expressed Glypican-3 and arose in a 47-year-old female with noncirrhotic NASH.

Case Report▴Top 

A 49-year-old Saudi woman, who was experiencing right-upper-quadrant pain, was referred by a private clinic for further management after an US revealed a large liver mass. She did not report a history of exposure known to be associated with the development of HCC. Her medical history included type 2 diabetes. She had no risk factors for viral hepatitis and never consumed alcohol. Her sister died at age 50 of an unknown liver disease. Her medications included only Metformin and insulin.

At admission, she was obese (BMI 31 kg/m2) with mild hepatomegaly and no evidence of chronic liver disease. There were no ascites or lower limb edema. Laboratory studies revealed the following values: total bilirubin, 0.2 (0.1 - 1.0 mg/dL); alanine transferase, 73 (20 - 65U/L); aspartate aminotransferase, 65 (7 - 41U/L); GGTP, 709 (5 - 85 U/L); total protein, 6.5 (6 - 8g /dL); albumin, 3.2 (3.5 - 4.8 g/dL); platelets, 202,000 (140 - 440 per uL); prothrombin time/international normalized ratio, 0.9; α-fetoprotein level, 10.7 (0 - 15 ng/mL); fasting blood sugar, 297 (70 - 110 mg/dl) and hemoglobin A1c, 8 (4 - 6). Autoimmune (antinuclear antibody and smooth muscle antibody) and hepatitis B and C serology were negative. The gastroscopy was negative for varices.

A triple-phase CT scan showed a 9 x 9 cm mass in segments V/VI of the liver and two smaller lesions in segments III/IV with arterial enhancement, portal venous washout consistent with multifocal HCC, as well as hepatic steatosis (Fig.1). There were no signs of portal hypertension or cirrhosis. The liver biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of HCC, and the patient then underwent resection of liver segments III and V/VI and intraoperative radiofrequency of the remaining lesion.

Figure 1.
Click for large image
Figure 1. Triphasic CT (Arterial Phase): Enhanced tumor (arrow) with hypodense center and fatty liver.

The histology revealed well-differentiated, trabecular HCCs with acinar and pseudoacinar patterns and Mallory hyaline bodies. Macrovesicular steatosis was noted in the patient’s tumor cells (Fig. 2), which stained positively for intracytoplasmic hyaline bodies (IHB) (Fig. 3) and had positive Glypican-3 staining (Fig. 4). The sections from the uninvolved liver showed moderate macro- and micro-vesicular steatosis, mild lobular inflammation with infiltration of mixed inflammatory cells and Mallory hyaline. Trichrome staining demonstrated minimal fibrosis (Fig. 5). There was no histopathological evidence for viral hepatitis, α1-antitrypsin deficiency, or hemochromatosis. The hepatitis B core antigen immunostaining, periodic acid Schiff/diastase (PAS/D), and iron histochemistry findings were negative.

Figure 2.
Click for large image
Figure 2. Well-differentiated HCC with micro-steatosis (arrow) (H & E x100).

Figure 3.
Click for large image
Figure 3. P62 expression of intracytoplasmic hyaline bodies (IHB) (arrow) in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Figure 4.
Click for large image
Figure 4. Glypican-3 (GPC-3) expression in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Figure 5.
Click for large image
Figure 5. Trichrome stain of liver showing micro-steatosis (arrow) and minimal fibrosis.

Postoperatively, the patient progressively developed signs of liver failure (hyperbilirubinemia and ascites). Follow-up liver US showed the local recurrence of multiple tumors, and the patient was not a candidate for transarterial chemoembolization or Sorafenib. Despite medical care, the patient died six months later from sepsis.

Discussion▴Top 

HCC is usually asymptomatic in the early stages. Because of their rapid growth rate and the lack of accurate ways of diagnosis in the early stages, the prognosis and the survival rate for liver cancer patients remains poor. Currently, US, CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the liver and in some cases histopathological examination for tumor biopsy is used for diagnosis of HCC with variable costs [15]. The imaging-based diagnosis of small tumors is relatively inaccurate, as cirrhotic and dysplastic nodules mimic HCC radiologically.

The availability of a suitable serological marker to distinguish between HCC and benign liver lesions would, therefore, be very useful for early diagnosis [16]. The only serological marker currently widely used for the diagnosis of HCC is AFP but has limited sensitivity. For example, serum AFP at a cut-off value of 20 ng/mL shows 60-80% sensitivity, although this sensitivity decreases to approximately 20-40% for the detection of small tumors [17]. Also certain subtypes of HCC are not associated with an elevated serum AFP level [6].

GPC3, oncofetal gene over-expressed specifically in human HCC, is a member of the HSP family associated with the cell membrane and the extracellular matrix that plays a role in cell growth, differentiation, and migration [18]. GPC3 promotes the growth of HCC by stimulating the autocrine/paracrine canonical Wnt signaling [19]. Several laboratories have recently reported that Glypican-3 is expressed by a large proportion of HCCs, but is undetectable in normal hepatocytes and non-malignant liver disease [20, 21]. Capurro et al [9] demonstrated that GPC3 immunoassay had potential as a serum diagnostic marker of HCC, with serological sensitivity and specificity of 53% and 95%, respectively. Hippo and colleagues [22] found that serum levels of soluble GPC3, the NH2-terminal portion of GPC3, were significantly higher in HCC patients, compared to patients with cirrhosis and healthy controls. Although the specificity of the test was very high in patients with chronic liver disease, the sensitivity was limited (within the same range as AFP) [23]. The combined use of serum GPC3 and AFP provides a potentially promising tool for diagnosis of HCC [24].

NASH-related cirrhosis is now a well-recognized cause of HCC. The natural history of HCC is fairly long, and the mechanisms of pathogenesis of HCC in the non-fibrotic liver are still unclear. NASH-associated insulin resistance causes inhibition of hepatic mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation; increased intracellular fatty acids may then lead to oxidative DNA damage by stimulating microsomal peroxidases. The exact mechanism behind the development of HCC in NASH remains unclear, although the pathophysiologic mechanisms behind the development of NASH related to insulin resistance and the subsequent inflammatory cascade likely contribute to the carcinogenic potential of NASH [25].

Multiple case reports of HCC in the setting of NASH have been published and this is nicely reviewed by Page et al [26]. The patients were typically male with advanced age at presentation than patients with HCC related to other chronic liver diseases. The risks for HCC development were cirrhosis, diabetes, and obesity. Few patients presented with HCC in the absence of cirrhosis raising the possibility that carcinogenesis can occur in NAFLD in the absence of advanced liver disease [14, 27]. Beale et al [28] conducted a cross sectional study assessing comparing the efficacy of Prothrombin Induced by Vitamin K Absence (PIVKA-II), GCP-3, Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen -1 (SCCA-1) and Follistatin, a monomeric protein overexpressed in rat and human liver tumours and reportedly contributing to hepatocarcinogenesis by the inhibition of activins, for the diagnosis of HCC arising on a background of 50 cirrhotic patients (31 had alcoholic liver disease (ALD) and 19 had NAFLD). The serum samples were compared to an independent group of 41 patients with biopsy proven ALD or NAFLD cirrhosis. Serum levels of GP3, SCCA-1 and follistatin had no HCC surveillance benefit in these patients. AFP and PIVKAII were superior to the other markers, particularly in combination. They conclude that while novel means of surveillance are urgently required, the combination of AFP and PIVKAII for HCC is an improvement on AFP alone in ALD/NAFLD patients.

Our patient had no evidence of cirrhosis and to our knowledge, this is the first report of GPC3 expression of HCC in a noncirrhotic NASH, lending support to the potential role and usefulness of GPC3 in diagnosing HCC in this subgroup of patients.

In conclusion, NASH with HCC is not limited to patients with NASH-related cirrhosis, and we describe a case where GPC3 is expressed in a HCC tumor in a patient without frank cirrhosis. The increasing prevalence of NASH, in addition to diabetes and obesity, highlight the need for further cost effectiveness studies on screening for HCC in this population.

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Samir S. Amr M.D., Chairman, Department of Pathology and Medical Labs at the King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia for his valuable assistance and advice during the preparation of this report and to Hala R. Makhlouf, M.D., Ph.D., Chief of the Department of Hepatic and Gastrointestinal Pathology at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) in Washington DC for the P62 and GPC3 special stains. I am also thankful to Prof. Fahad Al-Muhana at King Fahad Hospital of the University, Al-Khobar, for his helpful comments on the final manuscript.

Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures

None


References▴Top 
  1. El-Serag HB, Mason AC. Risk factors for the rising rates of primary liver cancer in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(21):3227-3230.
    pubmed doi
  2. Bosch FX, Ribes J, Diaz M, Cleries R. Primary liver cancer: worldwide incidence and trends. Gastroenterology. 2004;127(5 Suppl 1):S5-S16.
    pubmed doi
  3. Thorgeirsson SS, Grisham JW. Molecular pathogenesis of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Genet. 2002;31(4):339-346.
    pubmed doi
  4. Bugianesi E, Leone N, Vanni E, Marchesini G, Brunello F, Carucci P, Musso A, et al. Expanding the natural history of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: from cryptogenic cirrhosis to hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2002;123(1):134-140.
    pubmed doi
  5. Powell EE, Cooksley WG, Hanson R, Searle J, Halliday JW, Powell LW. The natural history of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a follow-up study of forty-two patients for up to 21 years. Hepatology. 1990;11(1):74-80.
    pubmed doi
  6. Yuen MF, Lai CL. Serological markers of liver cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;19(1):91-99.
    pubmed doi
  7. Daniele B, Bencivenga A, Megna AS, Tinessa V. Alpha-fetoprotein and ultrasonography screening for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2004;127(5 Suppl 1):S108-112.
    pubmed doi
  8. Gomaa AI, Khan SA, Leen EL, Waked I, Taylor-Robinson SD. Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(11):1301-1314.
    pubmed doi
  9. Capurro M, Wanless IR, Sherman M, Deboer G, Shi W, Miyoshi E, Filmus J. Glypican-3: a novel serum and histochemical marker for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2003;125(1):89-97.
    pubmed doi
  10. Nakatsura T, Yoshitake Y, Senju S, Monji M, Komori H, Motomura Y, Hosaka S, et al. Glypican-3, overexpressed specifically in human hepatocellular carcinoma, is a novel tumor marker. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;306(1):16-25.
    pubmed doi
  11. Wang HL, Anatelli F, Zhai QJ, Adley B, Chuang ST, Yang XJ. Glypican-3 as a useful diagnostic marker that distinguishes hepatocellular carcinoma from benign hepatocellular mass lesions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008;132(11):1723-1728.
    pubmed
  12. Bullock RE, Zaitoun AM, Aithal GP, Ryder SD, Beckingham IJ, Lobo DN. Association of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis without significant fibrosis with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2004;41(4):685-686.
    pubmed doi
  13. Cuadrado A, Orive A, Garcia-Suarez C, Dominguez A, Fernandez-Escalante JC, Crespo J, Pons-Romero F. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and hepatocellular carcinoma. Obes Surg. 2005;15(3):442-446.
    pubmed doi
  14. Guzman G, Brunt EM, Petrovic LM, Chejfec G, Layden TJ, Cotler SJ. Does nonalcoholic fatty liver disease predispose patients to hepatocellular carcinoma in the absence of cirrhosis?. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008;132(11):1761-1766.
    pubmed
  15. Andersson KL, Salomon JA, Goldie SJ, Chung RT. Cost effectiveness of alternative surveillance strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6(12):1418-1424.
    pubmed doi
  16. Sakamoto M. Early HCC: diagnosis and molecular markers. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(Suppl 19):108-111.
    pubmed
  17. Debruyne EN, Delanghe JR. Diagnosing and monitoring hepatocellular carcinoma with alpha-fetoprotein: new aspects and applications. Clin Chim Acta. 2008;395(1-2):19-26.
    pubmed doi
  18. Cheng W, Tseng CJ, Lin TT, Cheng I, Pan HW, Hsu HC, Lee YM. Glypican-3-mediated oncogenesis involves the Insulin-like growth factor-signaling pathway. Carcinogenesis. 2008;29(7):1319-1326.
    pubmed doi
  19. Capurro MI, Xiang YY, Lobe C, Filmus J. Glypican-3 promotes the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma by stimulating canonical Wnt signaling. Cancer Res. 2005;65(14):6245-6254.
    pubmed doi
  20. Abdul-Al HM, Makhlouf HR, Wang G, Goodman ZD. Glypican-3 expression in benign liver tissue with active hepatitis C: implications for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2008;39(2):209-212.
    pubmed doi
  21. Wang XY, Degos F, Dubois S, Tessiore S, Allegretta M, Guttmann RD, Jothy S, et al. Glypican-3 expression in hepatocellular tumors: diagnostic value for preneoplastic lesions and hepatocellular carcinomas. Hum Pathol. 2006;37(11):1435-1441.
    pubmed doi
  22. Hippo Y, Watanabe K, Watanabe A, Midorikawa Y, Yamamoto S, Ihara S, Tokita S, et al. Identification of soluble NH2-terminal fragment of glypican-3 as a serological marker for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2004;64(7):2418-2423.
    pubmed doi
  23. Filmus J, Capurro M. Glypican-3 and alphafetoprotein as diagnostic tests for hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Diagn. 2004;8(4):207-212.
    pubmed doi
  24. Tangkijvanich P, Chanmee T, Komtong S, Mahachai V, Wisedopas N, Pothacharoen P, Kongtawelert P. Diagnostic role of serum glypican-3 in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from non-malignant chronic liver disease and other liver cancers. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25(1):129-137.
    pubmed
  25. Starley BQ, Calcagno CJ, Harrison SA. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma: a weighty connection. Hepatology. 2010;51(5):1820-1832.
    pubmed
  26. Page JM, Harrison SA. NASH and HCC. Clin Liver Dis. 2009;13(4):631-647.
    pubmed doi
  27. Chagas AL, Kikuchi LO, Oliveira CP, Vezozzo DC, Mello ES, Oliveira AC, Cella LC, et al. Does hepatocellular carcinoma in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis exist in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients?. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2009;42(10):958-962.
    pubmed doi
  28. Beale G, Chattopadhyay D, Gray J, Stewart S, Hudson M, Day C, Trerotoli P, et al. AFP, PIVKAII, GP3, SCCA-1 and follisatin as surveillance biomarkers for hepatocellular cancer in non-alcoholic and alcoholic fatty liver disease. BMC Cancer. 2008;18(8):200.


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Gastroenterology Research is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Gastroenterology Research, bimonthly, ISSN 1918-2805 (print), 1918-2813 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.

This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.gastrores.org   editorial contact: editor@gastrores.org
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.