Gastroenterology Research, ISSN 1918-2805 print, 1918-2813 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Gastroenterol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.gastrores.org

Original Article

Volume 2, Number 2, April 2009, pages 86-90


Is There a Role for Sonde Enteroscopy in Patients with Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding? A Comparison with Capsule Endoscopy

Tables

Table 1. Overview of demographics and presenting complaints of PSE and M2A groups
 
PSE (N = 100)M2A Capsule (N = 101)
M2A, mouth-to-anus.
Men no. (%)45 (45)45 (44)
Women no. (%)55 (55)55 (56)
Age-yr67.3 (30-87)65.2 (13-87)
Chief presenting complaint
  Melena-no.(%)46 (46)27 (27)
  Occult Bleeding-no. (%)39 (39)67 (67)
  Hematochezia-no. (%)15 (15)6 (6)
Patients requiring previous transfusions-no. (%)73 (73)62 (62)

 

Table 2. Comparison of findings between PSE and M2A
 
Sonde Enteroscopy (n = 100)Push/Sonde Enteroscopy (n = 100)M2A Capsule (n = 101)
M2A, mouth-to-anus.
Patients identified with potential bleeding site43% (n = 43)55% (n = 55)59% (n = 60)
Vascular Ectasias60.46% (n = 26)69.09% (n = 38)56.67% (n = 34)
Active Bleeding4.65% (n = 2)3.64% (n=2)15% (n=9)
Ulcer/Erosion20.90% (n = 9)23.63% (n = 13)11.67% (n = 7)
Tumor9.34% (n = 4)12.72% (n = 7)5% (n = 3)
Hemangioma0% (n = 0)0%( n= 0)1.67% (n = 1)
Crohn's Disease0% (n = 0)0%(n = 0)10% (n = 6)

 

Table 3. Location of Sonde Enteroscopy Findings
 
FindingTotal findingsDuodenumJejunumIleum
Vascular ectasias267.69% (n = 2)73.07% (n = 19)19.23% (n = 5)
Ulcers90% (n = 0)88.89% (n = 8)12.11% (n = 1)
Tumors40% (n = 0)75% (n = 3)25% (n = 1)
Erosions20%(n = 0)100% (n = 2)0% (n=0)
Active Bleeding20% (n = 0)100% (n = 2)0% (n = 0)