Gastroenterology Research, ISSN 1918-2805 print, 1918-2813 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Gastroenterol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://www.gastrores.org

Original Article

Volume 16, Number 2, April 2023, pages 79-91


Outcomes and Complications of Radiological Gastrostomy vs. Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy for Enteral Feeding: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram of the literature review process.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Publication bias assessed by funnel plot diagram.
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Forest plot of (a) 30-day mortality, (b) tube leakage, and (c) tube dislodgement between PRG and PEG. PEG: percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy; PRG: percutaneous radiological gastrostomy.

Tables

Table 1. Study Characteristics
 
StudyYearDemographicsStudy designTotalPRGPEGIndications
ALS: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; CVA: cerebrovascular accident; HNC: head and neck cancers; NR: not reported; NMDs: neuromuscular disorders; PEG: percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy; PRG: percutaneous radiological gastrostomy; SD: standard deviation.
Allen et al [16]2013Mean age in PRG = 61 (SD ± 10.4); Mean age in PEG = 62 (SD ± 11.3); Male in PRG = 30 (57%); Male in PEG = 35 (61%)Retrospective1085157ALS
Alvarez-Alvarez et al [17]2022Mean age overall: 66; Male overall: 41%Retrospective25421ALS
Bazarah et al [18]2002Mean age in PRG = 51; Mean age in PEG = 65; Male in PRG = 16 (48%); Male in PEG = 14 (73%)Retrospective523319Neurological disorders (60%); HNC (21.2%); other
Blondet et al [19]2010Mean age in PRG = 66 (SD ± 12); Mean age in PEG = 66 (SD ± 11.2); Male in PRG = 11 (50%); Male in PEG = 6 (33%)Retrospective432221ALS
Carey et al [20]2004NRRetrospective1829686NR
Chandran et al [21]2017Median age in PRG = 64; Median age in PEG = 65; Male in PRG = 34 (65.4%); Male in PEG = 54 (63.5%)Retrospective1375285HNC (37.2%); CVA (27.7%); NMDs (6.6%); trauma (6.6%); esophageal cancer (5.8%); other (16.1%)
Cherian et al [22]2019Median age in PRG = 65 (35 - 89); Median age in PEG = 62 (18 - 91); Male in PRG = 65 (68%); Male in PEG = 242 (61%)Retrospective40395308HNC (62.9%); non-HNC malignancy (11%); other (26.1%)
Chio et al [23]2004Mean age in PRG = 69 (SD ± 9.5); Mean age in PEG = 65 (SD ± 10.3); Male in PRG = 12 (48%); Male in PEG = 13 (52%)Retrospective252550ALS
Clayton et al [24]2019Mean age in PRG = 62 (SD ± 16.4); Mean age in PEG = 66 (SD ± 17.3); Male in PRG = 82 (54%); Male in PEG = 90 (61%)Retrospective297150147Gastrointestinal disorders (59.9%); neurological disorders (19.5%); other (17.8%)
Cosentini et al [25]1998Median age in PRG = 57 (20 - 84); Median age in PEG = 55 (10 - 90); Male in PRG = 28 (63%); Male in PEG = 16 (66%)Retrospective684424HNC (66%); neurological disorders (19%); esophageal perforation (4%); cachexia (4%); esophageal cancer (3%); gastric cancer/decompression (3%)
Desport et al [26]2005Mean age in PRG = 66 (SD ± 9.7); Mean age in PEG = 65 (SD ± 10.3); Male in PRG = 5 (25%); Male in PEG = 21 (70%)Retrospective502030ALS
El Chaarani et al [27]2014Mean age in PRG = 69; Mean age in PEG = 72; Male in PRG = 111 (60%); Male in PEG = 87 (42%)Retrospective394186208NR
Elliot et al [28]1996NRProspective (non-randomized controlled trial (non-RCT))784533CVA (42%); cystic fibrosis (22%); malignancy (8%); chest disease (4%); other (24%)
Galaski et al [29]2009Mean age in PRG = 65 (SD ± 19); Mean age in PEG = 55 (SD ± 21); Male in PRG = 31 (71%); Male in PEG = 19 (63%)Retrospective744430Neurological disorders (31.1%); trauma (17.6%); HNC (10.8%); coronary artery disease (10.8%); other
Grant et al [30]2009Mean age in PRG = 65 (36 - 95); Mean age in PEG = 61 (28 - 97); Male in PRG = 39 (77%); Male in PEG = 79 (65%)Prospective (non-RCT)17251121HNC
Hazratjee et al [31]2012NRRetrospective26770197NR
Hoffer et al [32]1999Mean age in PRG = 58 (18 - 93); Mean age in PEG = 52 (18 - 89); Male in PRG = 36 (55%); Male in PEG = 41 (59%)Prospective (RCT)1356669Neurological impairment (80.7%); HNC (11.9%); gastrointestinal decompression (3%); other (4.4%)
Kim et al [33]2014Mean age overall = 60 (SD ± 17.5); Male overall = 102 (74%)Retrospective1384890Unable to eat (67.4%); recurrent aspiration (18.1%); esophageal stricture (10.1%)
Kohli et al [34]2021Mean age in PRG = 70 (SD ± 9.7); Mean age in PEG = 71 (SD ± 10.2); Male in PRG = 9,432 (97.1%); Male in PEG = 22,989 (97.6%)Retrospective (Nationwide Veterans Affairs Database)33,2819,71523,566Dysphagia/aphagia (86%); malignancy (65%); other non-malignant disorders including neurological diseases and aspiration pneumonia
Kohli et al [35]2021Mean age in PRG = 67 (SD ± 17.5); Mean age in PEG = 54 (SD ± 29); Male in PRG = 86,262 (56%); Male in PEG = 8,855 (54%)Retrospective (Nationwide Readmissions Database)170,391154,00716,384Dysphagia/aphagia (48%); malignancy including HNC; non-malignant disorders including neurological diseases, aspiration pneumonia, and sepsis
Kohli et al [36]2022Mean age in PRG = 68.6 (SD ± 8.23); Mean age in PEG = 68.3 (SD ± 7.13); Male in PRG = 100%; Male in PEG = 100%Prospective (non-RCT)924547HNC; esophageal cancer; other cancer; critical illness/ALS
La Nauze et al [37]2012Median age in PRG = 61 (16 - 92); Median age in PEG = 61 (16 - 94); Male in PRG = 69 (71%); Male in PEG = 53 (66%)Retrospective1779780HNC (27%); trauma (25%); stroke (23%); neuromuscular diseases/dementia (10%); other
Laasch et al [38]2003Mean age in PRG = 68 (27 - 86); Mean age in PEG = 73 (19 - 96); Sex = NRRetrospective1005050Neurological disorders; malignancy; nutritional support; other
Laskaratos et al [39]2012Mean age in PRG = 76.2 (48 - 93); Mean age in PEG = 69.4 (21 - 93); Male in PRG = 20 (50%); Male in PEG = 24 (45%)Retrospective934053CVA (31.2%); NMDs (30%); HNC (18.3%); other (22.6%)
Leeds et al [40]2010Mean age in PRG = 63; Mean age in PEG = 62; Male in PRG = 119 (70%); Male in PEG = 146 (64%)Retrospective403170233HNC (43%); neurological diseases (29%); dysphagic stroke (9%); other
Maasarani et al [41]2020Age = NR; Male in PRG = 14,416 (54.4%); Male in PEG = 110,933 (47.8%)Retrospective258,64126,477232,164NR
MacLean et al [42]2007Mean age in PRG = 57 (SD ± 19); Mean age in PEG = 51 (SD ± 21); Male in PRG = 113 (42%); Male in PEG = 74 (67%)Retrospective378110268Gastrointestinal surgery (21%); trauma and burns (12%); head and neck surgery (9%); gastrointestinal obstruction (7%); other
McAllister et al [43]2013NRRetrospective1108921HNC
McDermott et al [44]2015Mean age in PRG = 63.6 (SD ± 9.8); Mean age in PEG = 64.2 (SD ± 11.7); Male in PRG = 62 (51%); Male in PEG = 90 (55%)Retrospective284121163ALS
Moller et al [45]1999Median age in PRG = 64 (20 - 92); Median age in PEG = 48 (29 - 73); Male in PRG = 49 (52%); Male in PEG = 6 (50%)Retrospective1069412Neurological disorders (42%); malignancy (38%); other (20%)
Neeff et al [46]2003Mean age in PRG = 66 (SD ± 12); Mean age in PEG = 65 (SD ± 10.5); Male in PRG = 13 (72%); Male in PEG = 43 (77%)Retrospective741856HNC
Pannick et al [47]2019Median age overall = 64; Sex = NRRetrospective15513233Dysphagia (45.2%); HNC (36.8%); stroke (12.3%)
Park et al [6]2019Mean age in PRG = 66 (SD ± 13.3); Mean age in PEG = 67 (SD ± 14.8); Male in PRG = 58 (62%); Male in PEG = 234 (72%)Retrospective41894324Neurological diseases (70.8%); HNC (14.6%); esophageal cancer (6.5%); other
Pinar-Gutierrez et al [48]2021NRRetrospective896330896NR
Abd Rahim et al [49]2014NRRetrospective24416876Intracranial events; HNC; dysphagia
Righetti et al [50]2020Mean age in PRG = 64.1 (SD ± 12.6); Mean age in PEG = 63.0 (SD ± 15.0); Male in PRG = 340 (65.5%); Male in PEG = 134 (49.6%)Retrospective789519270Neurological indications (29%); cancer (36%); chronic aspiration (4.4%); malnutrition (22%); gastric outlet obstruction (8.4%); other (5.7%)
Rio et al [51]2010Mean age overall = 62 (SD ± 12); Sex = NRRetrospective14212121Motor neuron disease
Rustom et al [52]2006Mean age in PRG = 64.8; Mean age in PEG = 63.6; Male in PRG = 15 (53.6%); Male in PEG = 24 (60%)Retrospective682840HNC
Silas et al [53]2005Mean age in PRG = 63 (SD ± 14); Mean age in PEG = 68 (SD ± 15); Male in PRG = 114 (59.1%); Male in PEG = 100 (56.5%)Retrospective370193177Nutrition/dysphagia (93%); decompression (7%); neurological disorders (34%); malignancy (47%)
Strijbos et al [54]2019Mean age in PRG = 62 (SD ± 15); Mean age in PEG = 63 (SD ± 11); Male in PRG = 305 (65%); Male in PEG = 173 (60%)Retrospective760469291HNC (58%); ALS (7%); CVA (7%); Neurological disorders (7%); other including gastrointestinal and muscular diseases
Tan et al [55]2019Mean age overall = 66 (21 - 102); Male overall = 134 (54%)Retrospective24890158Altered mental status (37%); cognitive impairment (16%); malignancy (15%); dysphagia (14%); other (18%)
Vashi et al [56]2015Mean age in PRG = 56 (SD ± 9.1); Mean age in PEG = 54 (SD ± 10.7); Male in PRG = 30 (57.7%); Male in PEG = 45 (55.6%)Retrospective1335281Malignancy causing dysphagia, malnutrition, or need for decompression
Wollman et al [57]1997Mean age in PRG = 54 (15 - 89); Mean age in PEG = 55 (12 - 94); Male in PRG = 38 (56%); Male in PEG = 71 (62%)Retrospective18268114Neurological impairment (59.9%); HNC (20.9%); decompression (6.6%); other (12.6%)

 

Table 2. Quality Assessment of Non-Randomized Studies via Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS)
 
StudiesClearly stated aimConsecutive patient inclusionProspective data collectionAppropriate end-pointsUnbiased study end-point assessmentAppropriate follow-up periodAttrition bias (< 5%)Sample sizeAdequate control groupContemporary groupsBaseline equivalence of groupsStatistical analysisTotal score
Allen et al [16]22220220222220
Alvarez-Alvarez et al [17]22220220221118
Bazarah et al [18]22220220222220
Blondet et al [19]22220220222220
Carey et al [20]22220220221118
Chandran et al [21]22220220221219
Cherian et al [22]22220220221219
Chio et al [23]22220220222220
Clayton et al [24]22220220221219
Cosentini et al [25]22220220220218
Desport et al [26]22220220222220
El Chaarani et al [27]22220020221217
Elliot et al [28]22220220220218
Galaski et al [29]22220220221219
Grant et al [30]22220220221219
Hazratjee et al [31]22220220221219
Kim et al [32]22220220220117
Kohli et al [33]22220020220218
Kohli et al (divyanshu) [34]22220220220218
Kohli et al [35]22220220222220
La Nauze et al [36]22220220222220
Laasch et al [37]22220120221218
Laskaratos et al [38]22220220221219
Leeds et al [39]22220220221219
Maasarani et al [40]22220220222220
MacLean et al [41]22220120220217
McAllister et al [42]22220220220218
McDermott et al [43]22220220221218
Moller et al [44]22220220221118
Neeff et al [45]22220220220117
Pannick et al [46]22220220220218
Park et al [6]22220220222220
Pinar-Gutierrez et al [48]22220120220217
Abd Rahim et al [49]22220220220012
Righetti et al [50]22220020221217
Rio et al [51]22220220222220
Rustom et al [52]22220220220016
Silas et al [53]22220220221219
Strijbos et al [54]22220220221219
Tan et al [55]22220220220218
Vashi et al [56]22220220221219
Wollman et al [57]22220220221219

 

Table 3. Risk of Bias Assessment of the Included RCTs
 
StudyRandom sequence generation (selection bias)Allocation concealment (selection bias)Blinding of participants and personal (performance bias)Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)Selective reporting (reporting bias)Other bias
RCTs: randomized controlled trials.
Hoffer et al [32]LowLowLowLowLowLowLow