|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Review | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Volume 4, Number 3, June 2011, pages 93-96 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fidaxomicin for the Treatment of Clostridium Difficile Infection in the Pediatric
Population
- Not Quite So Soon Yet
Tanya Danielsa, Tsz-Yin Sob,
c
aUniversity
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA
Manuscript accepted for publication April 28, 2011
Abstract
Fidaxomicin is a new narrow spectrum macrocyclic antibiotic. It inhibits
bacterial RNA polymerase and eradicates
C difficile with minimal effect on normal intestinal flora.
The US FDA granted orphan drug designation for all formulations of
fidaxomicin for the treatment of
C
difficile infections in pediatric patients on January 10,
2011. Fidaxomicin has bactericidal activity against
C difficile with a prolonged post-antibiotic effect. Even
though this medication has an orphan designation for pediatrics, all the
available pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data were in subjects
≥ 18 years old. The MIC90
for fidaxomicin against
C. difficile varies from 0.0078 to 0.25 mcg/ml. Fidaxomicin
is poorly absorbed. The highest peak plasma concentration in patients
treated with fidaxomicin was 0.191 mcg/ml. Fecal levels of fidaxomicin
after oral administration are extremely high. The average fecal
concentrations in
C difficile patients were 255.6 mcg/g, 441.7 mcg/g, and
1443.3 mcg/g in the 100, 200, and 400 mg/day groups, respectively. At a
dose of 400 mg/day the average fecal concentration was 5700 times higher
than the highest MIC90
of fidaxomicin against
C difficile. In a phase III clinical trial fidaxomicin 200 mg
twice daily was compared with vancomycin 125 mg four times per day
orally for 10 days. Only two patients were 18 years old, and no patients
younger than 18 years old participated in the study. The rates of
clinical cure with fidaxomicin were noninferior to those with
vancomycin. Patients who were infected with non-North American Pulsed
Field type 1 strains had fewer recurrences in the fidaxomicin group than
patients in the vancomycin group. Side effects were similar between both
therapies. Most patients experienced mild gastro-intestinal symptoms.
Fidaxomicin is a good therapeutic alternative to vancomycin and
metronidazole, especially in patients with recurrence of
C difficile infection. Patients rarely experience systemic
side effects which improves compliance. The dose of fidaxomicin is
expected to be 200 mg given orally twice a day for patients 16 years and
older. At this point, Optimer Pharmaceuticals Inc has conducted clinical
trials in adults only. Additional clinical trials in pediatric patients
are needed before therapeutic recommendations can be made in this
population. Keywords: Fidaxomicin; Pediatrics; Clostridium difficile; Pharmacokinetic; Pharmacodynamic
Introduction Clostridium difficile is a gram-positive, anaerobic, spore-forming bacillus that is responsible for the development of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and pseudomembranous colitis. Occasionally, antibiotic therapy results in a disturbance of normal bacterial flora of the colon. This leads to colonization with C difficile which releases powerful toxins that cause mucosal inflammation and damage [1]. C difficile infection usually manifests as mild-to-moderate diarrhea accompanied by abdominal cramping, but some patients present with acute abdomen and life-threatening fulminant colitis [2]. C difficile colitis is one of the most common nosocomial infections. Approximately 20% of hospitalized patients acquire C difficile during hospitalization [3]. This infection affects more than 700,000 people, including pediatric patients, in the United States (US) yearly [4]. C difficile infections are a well-known cause of diarrhea in children. The number of C difficile cases in children older than 1 year old more than doubled between 1997 and 2006. Pediatric patients with C difficile infection were younger and more likely to be Caucasians and to have private insurance [5]. Most patients recover without specific therapy, but in some cases symptoms can be prolonged and debilitating. Vancomycin or metronidazole along with discontinuation of precipitating antibiotic is currently used to treat C difficile colitis [6]. While initial response to these medications is good, resistant strains of C difficile are emerging, and the rate of recurrence is quite high. Thirty percent of patients experience a recurrence of illness within 60 days [2].
Fidaxomicin (DificidTM)
is a first representative of a new class of narrow spectrum macrocyclic
antibiotic. Fidaxomicin is developed by Optimer Pharmaceuticals Inc.,
San Diego, CA. The US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) granted orphan drug
designation for all formulations of fidaxomicin for the treatment of
C difficile infections in pediatric patients 16 years old and
younger on January 10, 2011. The drug is currently under consideration
for standard approval by the FDA. Approval is expected to be in May 2011
[7]. In this
article we aim to provide a review on the pharmacokinetic and
pharmacodynamic profiles, dosage and tolerability, clinical
effectiveness and clinical application of fidaxomicin in the treatment
of
C difficile infection; and to evaluate if this medication is
appropriate to be used in the pediatric population with the available
evidence in the literature. A PubMed search was conducted using four
major search terms “fidaxomicin”, “pediatrics”, “pharmacokinetics” and
“pharmacodynamics”. When “pediatrics” was used as a search term with
“fidaxomicin”, no article was found. Pharmacodynamic Profile/Mechanism of Action
Fidaxomicin acts by inhibiting sigma-dependent transcription of
bacterial RNA polymerase and selectively eradicating
C difficile with minimal effect on normal intestinal flora.
Fidaxomicin has bactericidal activity against
C difficile with a prolonged (> 24 hours) post-antibiotic
effect. It demonstrates faster killing and longer antibacterial effect
after drug removal in comparison with vancomycin. Even though this
medication has an orphan designation for pediatrics, all the available
pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data were in subjects
≥ 18 years old. The value of MIC90
for fidaxomicin against
C. difficile varies from 0.0078 to 0.25 mcg/ml depending on
the
in vitro conditions. The value of the MIC90
increased 2 to 8 fold at more alkaline pH. Spontaneous resistance
was rare. There has been no cross-resistance with azithromycin,
ampicillin, telithromycin, ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, vancomycin,
rifampin, and rifaximin. Fidaxomicin lacks activity (MIC > 16 mcg/ml)
against Gram-negative anaerobes and facultative aerobes (i.e.,
Bacteroides species, enterobacteriaceae,
Haemophilus species, and
Pseudomonas
aeruginosa). It demonstrates activity (MIC < 2 mcg/ml)
against some Gram-positive anaerobes other than
C difficile (i.e.,
Peptostreptococcus species,
Clostridium perfringens, and some lactobacilli) but poor
activity (MIC > 4 mcg/ml) against many other Gram-positives organisms,
such as
Staphylococcus aureus (both methicillin-susceptible and
resistant) and
Enterococcus
faecium (both vancomycin-susceptible and resistant) [8].
Pharmacokinetic Profile
Dosage/Tolerability In
a phase II trial adult patients were taking 50 mg BID, 100 mg BID, or
200 mg BID of oral fidaxomicin. Subjects assigned to the 200 mg BID
group experienced the highest rates of clinical cure. Fidaxomicin
administered at this dose was very well tolerated. Nine out of forty
five subjects (four patients in each of the lower dosage groups and one
patient in the 400 mg/day group) reported adverse events. All adverse
events (fall, shortness of breath, pain in the extremity, renal colic,
bronchitis, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, hypotension, fluid
overload, pancreatitis, diarrhea, cardiac failure, angina,
cerebro-vascular damage, gastro-intestinal bleeding, and
Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia) appeared not to be related
to the study medication [11,
12]. Phase III Clinical Trial Phase III prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of fidaxomicin with those of vancomycin for the treatment of C difficile infection. Six hundred twenty nine adult patients (mean age 61 years) were enrolled in the US and Canada. Subjects who were older than 16 years old could participate in the study; but at the end of the enrollment, only two patients were 18 years old, and no patients younger than 18 years old participated in the study. All patients had acute symptoms of C difficile infection (more than three unformed bowel movements in the 24-hour period before randomization) and a positive result on a stool toxin test obtained within 48 hours before randomization. Subjects could have received up to four doses of metronidazole or vancomycin in the 24-hour period before randomization. Patients with life-threatening or fulminant C difficile infection, toxic megacolon, previous exposure to fidaxomicin, a history of ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease, or more than one occurrence of C difficile infection within 3 months before the start of the study were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned to receive fidaxomicin 200 mg twice daily or vancomycin 125 mg four times daily orally for 10 days. Patients in the fidaxomicin group received antibiotic every 12 hours with intervening matching doses of placebo. Subjects in the vancomycin group received medication every 6 hours. Both study medications and placebo were encapsulated to look the same. The primary end point was clinical cure, defined as resolution of symptoms and no need for further treatment of C difficile infection as of the second day after the end of the course of therapy. The secondary end points were recurrence of C difficile infection (diarrhea and a positive result on a stool toxin test within 4 weeks after treatment) and global cure (cure with no recurrence).
Five hundred forty eight patients (87.1%) were evaluated for the
per-protocol analysis. The rates of clinical cure with fidaxomicin were
noninferior to those with vancomycin in both the modified
intention-to-treat analysis (88.2% with fidaxomicin and 85.8% with vancomycin) and the per-protocol analysis (92.1% with fidaxomicin and
89.8% with vancomycin). Patients in the fidaxomicin group had fewer
recurrences of the infection than patients in the vancomycin group and,
as a result, had higher global cure rate. This was true for the
intention-to-treat analysis (15.4% with fidaxomicin and 25.3% with
vancomycin, P = 0.005) as well as for the per-protocol analysis (13.3%
with fidaxomicin and 24% with vancomycin, P = 0.004). The lower rate of
recurrence was seen in patients with non-North American Pulsed Field
type 1 strains only. The side effect profile was similar between the two
therapies. Most patients experienced mild gastro-intestinal symptoms. No
subject discontinued the medication as a result of intolerance or
allergy. Ninety five point eight percent (95.8%) of patients in the
fidaxomicin group and 96.1% of patients in the vancomycin group were
compliant with therapy [13].
(Table
2)
Fidaxomicin is a promising new drug for the treatment of C difficile colitis which has many advantages over metronidazole and vancomycin. Because of its narrow antimicrobial spectrum, normal intestinal flora is not affected. Unlike metronidazole, fidaxomicin is poorly absorbed. This allows substantial quantities of the drug to reach the colon. Patients also rarely experience systemic side effects, which can help improve compliance. Substantial reduction in C difficile (non-North American Pulsed field type 1 strains) recurrences in comparison with vancomycin is a major advantage of fidaxomicin. Increased activity of fidaxomicin against non-North American Pulsed field type 1 strains of C difficile can be explained by the differences in the sigma-factors exhibited by different strains. Bactericidal activity of fidaxomicin depends on the presence of certain sigma-factors in the bacteria. Fidaxomicin is a bactericidal antibiotic with prolonged post-antibiotic effect. These qualities provide advantage over vancomycin, which is a bacteriostatic antibiotic without post-antibiotic activity [8].
Fidaxomicin is a good therapeutic alternative to vancomycin and
metronidazole, especially in patients who experienced recurrence of
C difficile infection. Fidaxomicin can potentially be used as
a first line treatment in patients who previously had fecal cultures
positive for non-North American Pulsed field type 1
C difficile strains. Even though all these pharmacokinetic
and pharmacodynamic data are currently only in adults, researchers
potentially can use this information to conduct safety clinical trial in
pediatric patients in the future. As a matter of fact, Optimer
Pharmaceutical Inc. is developing an oral suspension formulation for
pediatric patients with
C difficile infection as required by the FDA [14]. Conclusion
C difficile
colitis can present a major problem in children treated with broad
spectrum antibiotics. At this point, Optimer Pharmaceuticals Inc. has
only conducted clinical trials in adults. The phase III study did not
include any pediatric patients and had only 2 patients who were 18 years
old. Additional pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic clinical trials in
pediatric patients are needed before therapeutic recommendations can be
made in this population. Metronidazole and oral vancomycin still should
be the mainstay of therapy for
C difficile infection in pediatric patients at this time. Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly related to
the content of this article. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| References | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1. |
Bartlett
JG. Clinical practice. Antibiotic-associated diarrhea. N Engl J Med
2002;346(5):334-339. [Medline] [CrossRef] |
| 2. |
Fekety R.
Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of Clostridium
difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis. American College of
Gastroenterology, Practice Parameters Committee. Am J Gastroenterol
1997;92(5):739-750. [Medline] |
| 3. |
McFarland
LV, Mulligan ME, Kwok RY, Stamm WE. Nosocomial acquisition of
Clostridium difficile infection. N Engl J Med 1989;320(4):204-210. [Medline] [CrossRef] |
| 4. |
Al-Eidan
FA, McElnay JC, Scott MG, Kearney MP. Clostridium difficile-associated
diarrhoea in hospitalised patients. J Clin Pharm Ther
2000;25(2):101-109. [Medline] [CrossRef] |
| 5. |
Nylund
CM, Goudie A, Garza JM, Fairbrother G, Cohen MB. Clostridium difficile
Infection in Hospitalized Children in the United States. Arch Pediatr
Adolesc Med 2011;165(5):451-457. [Medline] [CrossRef] |
| 6. |
Gouliouris T, Brown NM, Aliyu SH. Prevention and treatment of
Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Med 2011;11(1):75-79. [Medline] |
| 7. |
Optimer
Pharmaceuticlls, Inc. (2011). Fidaxomicin. Retrieved March 8, 2011 from
[Medline] |
| 8. |
Ackermann
G, Loffler B, Adler D, Rodloff AC. In vitro activity of OPT-80 against
Clostridium difficile. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004;48(6):2280-2282.
[Medline] [CrossRef] |
| 9. |
Shue YK,
Sears PS, Shangle S, Walsh RB, Lee C, Gorbach SL, Okumu F, et al.
Safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetic studies of OPT-80 in healthy
volunteers following single and multiple oral doses. Antimicrob Agents
Chemother 2008;52(4):1391-1395. [Medline] [CrossRef] |
| 10. |
Miller M.
Fidaxomicin (OPT-80) for the treatment of Clostridium difficile
infection. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2010;11(9):1569-1578. [Medline] [CrossRef] |
| 11. |
Gerber M,
Ackermann G. OPT-80, a macrocyclic antimicrobial agent for the treatment
of Clostridium difficile infections: a review. Expert Opin Investig
Drugs 2008;17(4):547-553. [Medline] [CrossRef] |
| 12. |
Citron
DM, Babakhani F, Goldstein EJ, Nagaro K, Sambol S, Sears P, Shue YK, et
al. Typing and susceptibility of bacterial isolates from the fidaxomicin
(OPT-80) phase II study for C. difficile infection. Anaerobe
2009;15(6):234-236. [Medline] [CrossRef] |
| 13. |
Louie TJ,
Miller MA, Mullane KM, Weiss K, Lentnek A, Golan Y, Gorbach S, et al.
Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection. N
Engl J Med 2011;364(5):422-431. [Medline] [CrossRef] |
| 14. |
Optimer
Pharmaceuticlls, Inc. (2011). Fidaxomicin. Retrieved April 12, 2011 from
[Medline] |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):10.4021/gr318e
About
DOI and
CrossRef
Gastroenterology Research is a member of CrossRef.




